Pre-Tutorial
I went into the library and looked through some books on advertising for content that was particularly relevant to the way charities advertise. I took out three books:
- Advertising as Communication - Gillian Dyer
- Celebrity Sells - Hamish Pringle
- Age of Propaganda - Pratkanis & Aranson
Between these three books the topics I am particularly interested in are:
- Tone of voice
- Language and the law
- The absence of language
- Visual rhetoric
- Celebrity as presenter
- Celebrities interacting
- The fear appeal
- Guilt Sells
I also found paragraph 4 of the 2000 First Things First Manifesto particularly appropriate;
"There are pursuits more worthy of our problem-solving skills. Unprecedented environmental, social and cultural crises demand our attention. Many cultural interventions, social marketing campaigns, books, magazines, exhibitions, educational tools, television programs, films, charitable causes and other information design projects urgently require our expertise and help."
This combined with the 4th footnote of Michael Beirut's 10 Footnotes to a Manifesto could make for an interesting argument.
"This litany of gruesome products has one thing in common: they are all things with which normal people are likely to be familiar. Yet haven't such common products comprised the subject matter that graphic designers haven't tackled throughout history? What is our design canon but a record of how messages about humble things like shoes, fountain pens, rubber flooring, booze, and cigars have been transformed by designers such as Bernhard, Lissitzky, Zwart, Cassandre and Rand? What makes dog biscuit packaging an unworthy object of our attention, as opposed to, say, a museum catalog or some other cultural project? Don't dachshund owners deserve the same measure of beauty, wit, or intelligence in their lives.
I also had a look through the powerpoint from the lecture on ethics (the only one I've missed so far, annoyingly), and found a key point from Kantianism and Utilitarianism that I can use to triangulate an argument in my essay.
Kantianism
Act so that you always treat both yourself and other people as ends in themselves, and never only as a means to an end. If you use people for your own benefit it is not moral.
Utilitarianism
An action is right to the extent that it increases the total happiness of the affected parties. A rule is right to the extent that it increases the total happiness of the affected parties.
Tutorial
I spoke to Richard about the sources I had found and was planning on using, he was very specific about the FTF Manifesto being a strong opening to the essay, and discussing how its view and the footnote from Beirut's argument in his 4th footnote oppose each other with reference to the ethical standpoints in Kantianism and Utilitarianism. From there I should introduce some of the stronger references from the books I took out and use an example of advertising to relate them to the more general references made by Beirut and the Manifesto, all the time using the ethical viewpoints for triangulation.
Richard suggested than I use Benetton as the main example of advertising because of how they're a corporate company that have used a charity-like style of advertising in their campaigns, and I could compare this to a more traditional charity like Oxfam.
In terms of the practical element to the project, we discussed the possibility of advertising a multi-national company such as McDonalds or Coca-Cola in a similar in a similar way to how charities stereotypically advertise themselves, and then be able to assess how that affects the image of the company, if that'd make it a successful campaign or not, and how a charity might utilise the sort of messages they give out.